" />
EST. 2011

Celtics Title Town

"IN RONDO WE TRUST"

Celtics Blog Post New Entry

Rondology: Rono No D

Posted by paul on July 8, 2013 at 7:10 PM

It was great to see today that Rondo spoke out publicly through his agent to express his strong desire to stay with the Celtics and his enthusiasm for working with Stevens and being a leader for the team...

 

His agent Bill Duffy told CSNNE.com that his client has no plans of asking for a trade, adding that Rondo is looking forward to working with new C's coach Brad Stevens.

"They (Rondo and Stevens) had a good conversation," Duffy told CSNNE.com. "Brad said that he wants to learn from Rajon, and they're both two pretty smart guys. They both have the same agenda. I think it'll be fine."

...

And Rondo, according to Duffy, is looking forward to getting to know Stevens a little better.

...

"He understands this is a great opportunity for him to assert his individual leadership," Duffy said. "So he has been mentored by some Hall of Fame guys now ... He has the opportunity to lead himself now and he relishes that opportunity."

Despite lowered expectations for the C's, Rondo's competitive drive will still push him and, to some degree, his teammates.

"He'll embrace this opportunity," Duffy said. "The question is, are the other players with him ready to be challenged the way he's going to challenge them?"

http://www.csnne.com/blog/celtics-talk/rondo-looking-forward-working-stevens

It's really quite an aggressive statement from Rondo, isn't it?  He's saying, if I get the meaning, that he expects to run the show to a significant extent, that he expects strong and mutual communication with Stevens, and that he expects his teammates to respect his leadership.  I think all this points to what we see more and more clearly did not happen last year.  Last year the team seemed to turn against Rondo's leadership, never really acknowleding him as their leader in the first place, and Doc did not seem to make a real effort to rebuild the offense with Rondo's talents and the talents of the incoming players in mind.  Rondo seems to be demanding that all that change this coming season.



I respect it that Rondo is making these demands.  I think that he absolutely should.  I find it bizarre that so many talking heads, bloggers and commenters seem to continue to talk about Rondo as a complementary player, some kind of niche player, questioning whether he is someone you can build a championship team around.  This is all utter raving nonsense!!!   Rondo is a guy who has driven his team deep into the playoffs over and over again with triple double or near triple double AVERAGES.  On offense, Rondo's authoritative ways are clear, and it's clear that  the defense's response to his movements on the floor open things up for the rest of the team, IF the rest of the team is aware and moving in response to what he does.  Imagine Rondo probing the offense and then cutting to the lane while Olynyk sets up for a three and Green flashes to the basket.  This could be effective offense.  On defense, Rondo is famous for knowing all the opponents' plays and his 'free safety' style implies overseeing what the opposing offense is doing, directing the defense where necessary and making moves to disrupt.  Rondo's game is really predicated on being his team's leader and key player.   



The Celtics may choose not to build around Rondo.  His performance last year raised a lot of questions about his leadership ability.  It would be understandable if Danny Ainge decided to cut bait and 'cash in' Rondo for rebuilding assets.  There seem to be, suddenly, some strongly interested teams, such as Houston and Detroit, that seem to be considering making tempting offers.  I hope Danny doesn't go for any such offers.  To me it's folly, when you have a player whose best seems to be somewhere between superstar and transformational, to go desperately searching for someone to build around.  You have that person.  Now let's figure out how to really make it all work.  



And some of that has to come back to Rondo.   There seems to be a rather unpleasant elephant getting bigger all the time in the world of Rondo-dom.   Those who are not Haters surely appreciate how effective and disruptive to the other team Rondo's floaty defense can be, but we've also seen a disturbing trend for other teams to go straight at Rondo, knowing that he does not seem to be willing or able to dig in defensively.  Nor does he seem willing, or able, to extend the floor for the opposing offense by pressuring the advance of the ball.  Obviously we do not want Rondo playing defense the same way Bradley does.  It would exhaust Rondo.  It would foul him out of games.  It would waste his unique defensive talents he has due to his length and floor vision.   What is needed is some sort of balance between Rondo's floaty approach to defense and Bradley's 'honey badger' style.  Shawn mentioned that he'd like to see Rondo win DPOY.  I'd like to see that too, and I think it will happen if Rondo can find the right balance between his 'free safety' defense and a more dug in approach.  




I think it was painfully clear last year that, setting aside the difficulties that Rondo had establishing his authority in the presence of the Big Three and Rivers, all of whom tended to treat him as a kid (and I don't think Terry helped with that), it was Rondo's poor man-to-man defense that cost him the team's respect.  I'm sure we all remember that at one point last year, Bradley even dissed Rondo's defense on Twitter!   Dissed on Twitter by your teammate.  Wow.  That's telling.  It suggests me that there were ringleaders in the lockerroom encouraging disrespect for Rondo, and I don't mean just the newcomers either.  But I think it also makes it clear why Rondo couldn't get the team to follow his lead.  




So I'm disappointed not to see Rondo acknowledging that he needs to step it up himself next year, especially on the defensive end.  A steady diet of that matador defense we saw so much of in recent years, especially last year, will surely destroy any attempts Rondo makes to lead the team, and will surely earn Rondo a seat on the Ainge Express.  I wonder sometimes how much worry over a possible return of plantar fasciitis affects Rondo, maybe especially on defense.  I can say from experience that it is an ailment that once experienced is not easily forgotten.  It's an ailment that seems to punish you for your attempts to hustle and push your body's limits.  If there are such concerns in Rondo's head, I hope they can be addressed through physical therapy/flexibility training or in some other way, as I think the doorway to Rondo's future lies through what for him has been a bit of a valley of darkness recently - the land of Defense.  Defense defense defense.  The guards are going to have to be the defensive powerhouse of this team going forward.  They should have been so last season.   Let's bury the painful memory of Rono No D, amidst the rise of RonDo, Big D!


Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

6 Comments

Reply rcraig617
8:33 PM on July 8, 2013 
Without kg we will definetly need rondo to step up. I think he can play solid man to man defense. The pick and roll is where rondo can only do so much it will depend on how the team rotates because rondo isn't going to run through opposing centers and power forwards. That is why miami is so good defensively they take away the pick and roll. I'm not saying to play defense how they play because they have different personnel which allows them to do so but we need to find some way to contain the pick and roll I think that was our main problem last year along with finishing off defensive possessions with rebounds but I think we can easily fix the rebounding.
Reply C'slife
8:50 PM on July 8, 2013 
You don't need bigs to have a good defensive team. Look at the Sonics in the 90's with Payton, and the Pistons of the 80's had both. Jordan in the 90's as well. The Celtics still have good defensive players. Wallace who's coming over to go along with Bradley and Rondo.
Reply Birdman33
8:54 PM on July 8, 2013 
I agree about the complementary player thing. Don't most say he's a top five point guard, and the best play maker? If Rondo takes the number one mantle, wouldn't this team be simalr to the Bulls? Maybe not the defensive schemes, but roster wise. I would say the only difference would Noah. Who would check him? It;s all in Rondo's court.
Reply paul
9:23 PM on July 8, 2013 
Birdman33 says...
I agree about the complementary player thing. Don't most say he's a top five point guard, and the best play maker? If Rondo takes the number one mantle, wouldn't this team be simalr to the Bulls? Maybe not the defensive schemes, but roster wise. I would say the only difference would Noah. Who would check him? It;s all in Rondo's court.


I think you are right that our offense could in some ways resemble the Chicago offense as led by Rose, where Rose attacks the paint and either scores or dishes in some way. The thing is, I think Rondo can do WAY more than Rose. He's a guy who can move all over the court, pulling the defense with him. I still remember Miami double teaming Rondo out on the three point line. That's some crazy respect, and playmaking thrives in that atmosphere of almost hysterical respect.
Reply paul
9:25 PM on July 8, 2013 
Cslife, I think we could maybe have a great defensive team, but Rondo has got to step up and claim his leadership role on the defensive end. He doesn't have to be like Bradley. We wouldn't want that. But he's just got to mix some Bradley into the way he plays D
Reply paul
9:33 PM on July 8, 2013 
rcraig617 says...
Without kg we will definetly need rondo to step up. I think he can play solid man to man defense. The pick and roll is where rondo can only do so much it will depend on how the team rotates because rondo isn't going to run through opposing centers and power forwards. That is why miami is so good defensively they take away the pick and roll. I'm not saying to play defense how they play because they have different personnel which allows them to do so but we need to find some way to contain the pick and roll I think that was our main problem last year along with finishing off defensive possessions with rebounds but I think we can easily fix the rebounding.

rcraig, i'd take what you are saying a step further: as Bradley discovered in the playoffs, even the best defensive player cannot count on shutting down an opposing pg in the game today. These guys are SO fast, and with hand-checking not being allowed, it's nearly physically impossible to play D on them at times. So Rondo, like every other guy defensing a pg, is going to get beaten plenty. But at times its just been far far too easy for opposing pgs to beat Rondo, and even on picks and screens, it's often been way too easy to scrape Rondo off. There's only so much he can do. As you say, he isn't going to be shoving 250lb guys out of his way. But remember, defense in basketball is never an absolute thing. It's not about absolutely preventing the other team from doing what they want to do. It's about making it all more difficult for them, and cutting down their percentages. The bottom line, so to speak, is that Rondo's guys have been penetrating too easily, and the interior defense, already weakened, as been further breaking down due to the unimpeded penetration. Rondo has to step up on D. It's so important. He needs to choose more wisely when to be stubborn sometimes.