" />
EST. 2011

Celtics Title Town


Celtics Blog Post New Entry

Celtics Morning Joe: C's built to win, within luxury tax

Posted by shawn cassidy on July 29, 2012 at 8:05 AM

Being underdog has advantages.  Nothing  to lose, and everything  to gain. Losing can lead to  shame,  winning is all about want, and desire. One can fight the opponent without fear.A team can fight the opponent without any feelings of losing. Year after year, it seems like the Celtics are underdogs. Going into next season, a few teams in the East have changed. But I can't see the Celtics as big underdogs this season. Anything can happen, but healthy the Celtics have it all.

The Celtics year after year, build a roster to win, and this year is no different. But I still have a bad taste in my mouth about how the ownership group forced Danny into trading Perk. Even though a disagree with that decision. I feel good about Wyc, and his fellow owners. They seem to provide Danny with money to go all in. But with the new collective bargaining agreement. Every team wants to stay away from the luxury tax.  The Celtics will do that at a low cost, and they have built this roster to win now.Can't ask for more.

The Celtics have paid to play-ESPN Boston

The Boston Celtics will enjoy their lowest luxury-tax payment since the start of the Big Three era next season. But don’t misconstrue it: The Celtics keenly managed the cap this summer in order to produce the most competitive roster possible, and this team has never been afraid to spend.

By staying within the luxury-tax apron ($4 million over the $70.3 million tax threshold), the Celtics were able to utilize the full value of the midlevel exception ($5 million) this offseason. That allowed them to lock up Jason Terry early in the free-agency process, helping to offset the eventual loss of Ray Allen. By utilizing the full midlevel, the Celtics were essentially hard-capped at $74.3 million this season, meaning their dollar-for-dollar tax bill next year won’t exceed $4 million.

For a team that’s paid $44.5 million in luxury-tax penalties over the past five seasons, that’s a nice break. Boston paid a whopping $14.9 million in luxury tax during the 2009-10 campaign and $7.4 million last year.

But a smaller bill shouldn’t be viewed as less of a commitment to winning. The Celtics haven’t been afraid to spend in a league in which others have often been reluctant.

Earlier this week, ShamSports.com released a fascinating glimpse at the history of luxury-tax payments since its inception during the 2001-02 season. Only four teams have paid more in luxury tax than the Celtics: the Mavericks (deep-pocked owner Mark Cuban hasn’t been afraid to build a competitor), Lakers (Kobe Bryant’s contract alone practically ensures they’ll always be in the tax), Knicks (paying for their own mistakes), and Blazers (Portland paid $80 million in the first two years of the tax with a bloated salary, but has spent only $8.2 million since).

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In


Reply paul
9:05 AM on July 29, 2012 
I hate the way the owners stuck it to the players, led by our owners, reputedly, and leading with the Perk Trade, in my opinion (the shot across the players' bow); but I blame the players a lot more. They STILL haven't gotten rid of Hunter. Well then, they deserve whatever they get. What hold does this guy have on them? Does he have a room full of secret tapes?

Danny has done a great job this summer. I hope Rondo is seeing what can be done when the best player on a team choses NOT to max out.
Reply Greg
9:48 AM on July 29, 2012 
I think Rondo will deserve to max out though. He would basically do that when Pierce leaves. So the Celtics can still add players around Rondo. I don't think Rondo will get KG money,or Kobe money. But making 16 million a year is good.
Reply Franklin
4:22 PM on July 29, 2012 
The league has so much talent, taking pay cuts is the new way.