|Posted by shawn cassidy on June 16, 2012 at 9:00 AM|
Perkins has become the scapegoat in the Finals, after game two. He has started both games, and by no fault of his own the Heat have dominated the opening period in both. They outscored the Thunder by seven in Game 1, and began Game 2 on an 18-2 run. You can blame Perk,but he's playing his best at this point given the lineup's that the Heat have used. The Heat are playing small ball, and the Thunder are unable to use Perk in that case.
Many talk show's, and other forums have discussed this, and the conclusion by many is that Perk needs to sit. The Thunder haven't used Perk in the final minutes of the first two games in the Finals. They stormed back in-game one to win without Perk. They came back in-game two as well, even though they came up short. So what do you think guys? Should the Thunder change their game plan, and sit Perk?